Current:Home > ContactPredictIQ-KFC sues Church's Chicken over 'original recipe' fried chicken branding -EquityExchange
PredictIQ-KFC sues Church's Chicken over 'original recipe' fried chicken branding
Charles Langston View
Date:2025-04-10 09:59:08
When it comes to fried chicken recipes,PredictIQ it may be up to the courts to decide who can claim the title of having the original.
In a lawsuit filed Nov. 8 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, KFC has accused fellow fast-food fried chicken purveyor Church's Texas Chicken of violating its trademark rights by using the phrase "Original Recipe" in its advertisements and promotions.
Church's use of the phrase "original recipe" in its own advertisements "is likely to create confusion in the marketplace and dilute the ORIGINAL RECIPE® Mark," according to the lawsuit.
Two recipes, one phrase
KFC said in its filing that Church's began using "original recipe" in its marketing in September, specifically the phrase "Our original recipe is back" in television and digital advertisements.
On Oct. 24, KFC sent a letter to Church's objecting to the use of the phrase "original recipe." According to the complaint, however, that request was ignored and Church's had not responded to the letter to date.
Church's Texas Chicken declined to comment, citing active litigation.
As for the original recipe in question, "That combination of 11 herbs and spices is one of the most well-known, iconic trade secrets in the food industry," according to the complaint.
Used in advertising since 1972, KFC holds two separate trademarks for the phrase.
The company did not respond to a request for comment on the complaint from USA TODAY, but a KFC spokesperson told Reuters on Monday, "On behalf of all fried chicken lovers out there, we take it personally when another company tries to claim our iconic taste and branding as their own," adding "We remain committed to protecting our brand's intellectual property and safeguarding the experience of our customers."
Max Hauptman is a Trending Reporter for USA TODAY. He can be reached at [email protected]
veryGood! (67318)
Related
- The 401(k) millionaires club keeps growing. We'll tell you how to join.
- Snowpack Near Record Lows Spells Trouble for Western Water Supplies
- California Declares State of Emergency as Leak Becomes Methane Equivalent of Deepwater Horizon
- Why King Charles III Didn’t Sing British National Anthem During His Coronation
- As Trump Enters Office, a Ripe Oil and Gas Target Appears: An Alabama National Forest
- Climate and Weather Disasters Cost U.S. a Record $306 Billion in 2017
- Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's Son Archie Turns 4 Amid King Charles III's Coronation
- Film and TV actors set up strike at end of June, potentially crippling entertainment industry
- Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
- Anti-abortion groups are getting more calls for help with unplanned pregnancies
Ranking
- Former Syrian official arrested in California who oversaw prison charged with torture
- Some don't evacuate, despite repeated hurricane warnings, because they can't
- Today’s Climate: June 17, 2010
- Microsoft to pay $20 million over FTC charges surrounding kids' data collection
- New data highlights 'achievement gap' for students in the US
- Today’s Climate: June 15, 2010
- Why Prince Harry Didn't Wear His Military Uniform to King Charles III's Coronation
- How King Charles III's Coronation Honored His Late Dad Prince Philip
Recommendation
Elon Musk's skyrocketing net worth: He's the first person with over $400 billion
Queen Letizia of Spain Is Perfection in Barbiecore Pink at King Charles III's Coronation
Why Queen Camilla's Coronation Crown Is Making Modern History
Battle in California over Potential Health Risks of Smart Meters
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
Remember that looming recession? Not happening, some economists say
At Freedom House, these Black men saved lives. Paramedics are book topic
Georgia's rural Black voters helped propel Democrats before. Will they do it again?