Current:Home > MarketsKentucky judge keeps ban in place on slots-like ‘gray machines’ -EquityExchange
Kentucky judge keeps ban in place on slots-like ‘gray machines’
View
Date:2025-04-27 17:32:01
FRANKFORT, Ky. (AP) — Supporters of a Kentucky law banning slots-like machines scored a legal victory Friday when a judge kept in place a measure to permanently unplug the video games that offered cash payouts and were branded as “gray machines” during legislative debates.
Franklin County Circuit Judge Phillip Shepherd rejected claims that the 2023 law violated various sections of the state’s constitution. The judge granted a summary judgment requested by state Attorney General Russell Coleman’s office, meaning he ruled without a full trial on the matter.
In defending the statute, Coleman said Friday that his office argued on behalf of the Legislature’s “fundamental role” as the state’s policymaking body. He praised lawmakers for taking a “bold and bipartisan step to protect Kentucky children and families when they outlawed ‘gray machines.’”
The devices were branded as “gray machines” based on their murky legal status at the time.
Kentucky House Speaker David Osborne said the ruling “further confirms that these games were illegal and operating without any of the appropriate regulatory guidelines.”
An attorney for the plaintiffs, J. Guthrie True, said in an emailed statement that his team “will be evaluating the ruling and consulting with our clients concerning an appeal.”
The law banning the devices was one of the most heavily lobbied and hotly contested measures in Kentucky’s 2023 legislative session. The debate revolved around the proliferation of cash payout games set up in convenience stores, gas stations and bars across the Bluegrass State.
Supporters referred to them as legal “skill games” and promoted rival legislation that would have regulated and taxed the machines. Opponents of the games warned that a failure to banish the devices would have led to the largest expansion of gambling in Kentucky history.
In his ruling, Shepherd rejected multiple arguments by the plaintiffs, including claims that the law violated free speech rights and arbitrarily banned games of skill in violation of Kentucky’s constitution.
“It was entirely unreasonable, based on Kentucky’s long history of regulating gambling ... for an investor to expect that any machine operating on the fringe zones of legality as a gambling device would be exempt from subsequent regulation or prohibition by the Legislature,” the judge wrote.
The measure banning the devices, he said, was a “lawful exercise of the Legislature’s police power to regulate gambling for the legitimate governmental interest in addressing the social harms of unregulated forms of gambling.”
In recent years, Kentucky lawmakers passed other legislation that secured the legal status of wagering on historical racing machines — a lucrative revenue source tapped into by horse tracks in the state. The slots-style historical racing machines allow people to bet on randomly generated, past horse races. The games typically show video of condensed horse races. The tracks have reinvested some of the revenue to make Kentucky’s horse racing circuit more competitive with casino-backed tracks in other states.
veryGood! (4211)
Related
- Woman dies after Singapore family of 3 gets into accident in Taiwan
- Fourth man charged in connection with threats and vandalism targeting two New Hampshire journalists
- Kentucky misses a fiscal trigger for personal income tax rate cut in 2025
- Having a bad day? Cheer up with one of these books with pick-me-up power
- This was the average Social Security benefit in 2004, and here's what it is now
- This $22 Longline Sports Bra Doubles as a Workout Top and It Has 20,300+ 5-Star Reviews
- Disney temporarily lowers price of Disney+ subscription to $1.99
- What's Making Us Happy: A guide to your weekend viewing and listening
- A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
- Stephen Strasburg's planned retirement hits a snag as Nationals back out of deal
Ranking
- 'No Good Deed': Who's the killer in the Netflix comedy? And will there be a Season 2?
- Georgia special grand jury report shows Graham and others spared from charges, and more new details
- Trump's trial in New York AG's $250M lawsuit expected to take almost 3 months
- Illinois child, 9, struck and killed by freight train while riding bike to school
- The FBI should have done more to collect intelligence before the Capitol riot, watchdog finds
- Russia holds elections in occupied Ukrainian regions in an effort to tighten its grip there
- Texas paid bitcoin miner more than $31 million to cut energy usage during heat wave
- From spaceships to ‘Batman’ props, a Hollywood model maker’s creations and collection up for auction
Recommendation
See you latte: Starbucks plans to cut 30% of its menu
Voters in North Carolina tribe back adult use of marijuana in referendum
Drake announces release date for his new album, 'For All the Dogs'
Lahaina's children and their families grapple with an unknown future
Federal court filings allege official committed perjury in lawsuit tied to Louisiana grain terminal
A menstrual pad that tests for cervical cancer? These teens are inventing it
13 reasons why Detroit Lions will beat Kansas City Chiefs on Thursday
New Toyota Century SUV aims to compete with Rolls Royce Cullinan, Bentley Bentayga